"You made how much?" I screamed down the phone to the calm voice on
the other side of the Atlantic. Tapping away at my calculator, I
continued in disbelief, "but that means you earned for Salomon Brothers
an average of $250,000 each and every single trading day for eight
years!" I resisted the urge to faint, or swear.
I had spoken to many successful traders, but the conversation
with Bill Lipschutz, with whom I had had the above conversation, former
global head of foreign exchange and managing director at Salomon
Brothers, stuck in my mind for the size of his trading successes.
This was my point of arrival, after having spoken and
interviewed, even cross-examined and interrogated, the world's leading
traders. The original quest was to find what, if anything, they had in
common despite their differences. I did not want the trite and over-used
"cut your losses short, set stop-losses, etc., etc." type of insight.
Traders know to cut their losses short, they want to know they are
cutting it short and not cutting a potential profit short. Too often the
trite rule has missed the real difficult issue.
Nor did I want advice which only the professional trader could
use or understand. I wanted to discover something for professional and
private traders alike. I wanted to rip out and hold in my hand for close
inspection the very heart of trading success.
Any conclusions would be irresistibly and irrefutably strong (as
well as hopefully being insightful and original ) because it would
relate to trading itself, not just one product, or technique or tool or
country. I was not disappointed.
The common element that linked them all, and separated them from
their less successful colleagues was their frame of mind; their
attitudes to trading, to losses, to open positions, to profits, to
success and failure. Indeed, they redefined success and failure itself.
Their perspective was unlike that exhibited by any less successful
traders. They had a way of viewing trading such that if you were to
force them to trade according to a particular system, they would still
be more profitable than their colleagues using the same system. They
added a value to any potentially profitable trading technique and tool
to turn it into a superior profit maker.
A list of the main traits these leading traders exemplified follows:
Opportunity Knocks the Door Down
Since kindergarten each of us is taught to grab opportunities for
they do not knock twice. It is precisely that type of advice, which is
so useful in other walks of life, but detrimental in trading.
Many traders, armed with their trading plan or strategy, will
often hastily and prematurely enter a trade. Their decision is often
driven by fear; the fear of the missed opportunity. Their mind will be
screaming, "quick get on the trade, you're going to miss it, so what if
all your criteria for entering a trade have not been met? Most of them
have, so get on the trade. The big traders wouldn't hang around."
The inevitable result is that the trade will not be profitable or
as profitable as it would have been had the trader waited for the
precise moment to strike.
In trading, the fear of the missed opportunity leads to many
avoidable losses. And the game of trading is as much about avoiding
losses as about capturing profits. The leading traders have a different
perspective on opportunity. Counter-intuitively they know opportunity
knocks once, twice and then kicks the door down. They know that if this
trade does not feel absolutely perfect, there will be another one along
in a short while. That knowledge alleviates and over-rides any fear.
That knowledge is the key to unlocking greater profits by waiting for
all the trade entry criteria to be met and not cutting corners.
Bill Lipschutz summed it up when he said, "Out of 250 trades in a
year, it comes down to five, three of those will be wrong and you will
lose a fortune and two will be right and you will make a fortune; for
the other 245 trades-you should have been sitting on your hands."
Great Traders Tend to be Risk Averse
There is a general perception, once again more propagated by life
and not trading experiences, that one needs to risk a lot to profit a
lot. Every one of the traders I interviewed stated unequivocally that
they were risk-averse. As Bernard Oppetit, global head of equity
derivatives at Banque Paribas put it, "you do not need to risk a lot to
profit a lot." Jon Najarian, CBOE director and the chairman of Mercury
Trading put it similarly, "making money today is not more important than
being able to come back tomorrow."
Pat Arbor, chairman of the Chicago Board of Trade, warned against
going for the "home-run." His trading philosophy is based on "una
fagiola;" one bean, at a time into the bag. As one of the most
experienced and successful traders on CBOT, he insists trying to put
lots of "beans into the bag" at once will result in most not going in.
He counsels that the steady approach will result in far more profits in
the longer run.
The message is to wait, and wait for a high probability trade in
the knowledge that they do exist and can lead to as great a profit as
more risky trades. Moreover the danger of riskier trades is not only a
loss, but also such a loss that you have no funds left.
Luck: Stacking the Odds
Following on from the nature of traders as being risk-averse,
they have a knack for stacking the odds. As Lipchutz puts it, "I happen
to believe that by far the biggest component of trading success is luck,
it's not the rolling the dice type of luck, but stacking the odds."
These top traders practice their risk aversion by ensuring the odds of a
successful outcome are heavily stacked in their favor.
This is not only done by ample research and planning, but also
recognizing that when they are in a good trade to "push their luck." As
David Kyte, chairman of the Kyte Group and the largest local on LIFFE
put it, "you do not step in the way of a train that's going at full
steam." Najarian and Kyte both said, "You make your own luck in this
game" meaning that you stack the odds of making a profitable trade by
planning and waiting until all your trade entry criteria are satisfied,
if then the trade does prove to be as lucrative as it promised you "push
your luck" by perhaps adding to the position and riding it for all it
is worth.
The Emotional Problem
Trader's attitude to their potential and existing positions is
often a great determinant of success. As every trader knows, the moment a
trade is executed, everything is different. That is the point at which
it becomes real, no longer digits on a screen and numbers in an account.
Now expectation is joined by anticipation. The brain is joined by the
heart. Reason is joined by emotion. You exchange detachment for
attachment.
When you have an open position and you are looking to close it,
you will either have a profit or a loss. The emotions relating to each
are quite different. For instance, when sitting on a loss many traders
experience hope that the position will turn around because they fear and
deny that it may not. It is for you to recognize these emotions and to
discard them. Your judgment has to be based on detached reason relating
to your analysis of the company.
How you behave once you have an open position is all important.
Without clear thinking you could exit too soon or too late. Your key
concern with an open position is timing your exit. Of course there are
times when you are deciding whether to add to a position, but generally
you are concerned with exit. With an open position, you are concerned
with closing the position. In order to do that, an open position
requires an open mind.
"The key is to be intellectually honest. You have to think of
every day as a clean slate. You've got to forget about your loss or how
much you paid-you have to treat each day as a completely new day. You
have to start everyday with a blank page. Mark to market should be the
rule so you start each day afresh. There is no expected profit or loss
on the book so you have to start from scratch each morning," says
Oppetit.
Poor Planning Produces Pathetic Performance
Although an SAS motto, the above is equally applicable to
trading. The top traders did not trade "by the seat of their pants."
Planning and its benefits was a key aspect to the way they viewed the
markets. The top traders plan "what if" scenarios and think about their
response to each probable outcome. The main benefits were that with plan
in hand or in mind the trader's confidence is enhanced, fear of loss
reduced and that in turn assists clear thinking and removal of hope so
ensuring the trader stays focused on his original reason for entering
the trade.
Oppetit summed this up well when he said, "whether I get out at a
profit or loss does not matter." Martin Burton, founder and managing
director of Monument Derivatives and former director of NatWest Markets
was talking about the same thing when he said, "it is not a 90 minute
game." They both know that sticking to their plan is far more important
than temporary blips in their profit and loss accounts.
Losses-A Curious View
The top traders were totally at ease with losing. This is not
something one expects from those at the top of their profession.
Although true in other walks of life, that perfection is to be sought,
in trading, perfection is not an option. Paul RT Johnson, vice president
at ING Securities and a director at CBOT said bluntly, "You are going
to be wrong. You are not perfect."
The top traders would cut their loss and move on. The issue was
not whether the market may turnaround if they hung in there. They cut
their loss if it is what they had said they would do in their plan. They
would get out at the predetermined level. The discipline of sticking to
the plan was primary and the real issue. To say "cut your losses short"
missed the whole point and was of no help to anyone. By cutting their
loss, they would free up capital to place in more profitable positions
elsewhere, and free up mental energy to focus on new opportunities.
Arbor summed it up by saying, "your first loss is your best loss."
Conclusion
It is not possible to do justice to the wisdom and accumulated
experiences of the world's leading traders in a short article. However, I
have tried to convey how their minds work in a way that apparently runs
against common intuition. These differing perspectives ensure that with
the same tools and products everyone has to trade with, they make far
more in profits because their minds are different.
By :Alpesh Patel , is an attorney turned trader and the author of The Mind of a Trader: Lessons in Trading Strategy from the World's Leading Traders
published by Financial Times Pitman Publishing (order number
800-462-6420). He operates his own derivatives fund concentrating on
traded equity options. He has extensive experience in both the U.K. and
U.S. derivatives markets and holds equities in the U.K., India, France
and the U.S. As a former chairman of the University of London Finance
Society, he has lectured extensively on trading techniques. As a lawyer
he advised banks, building societies, and pension funds on financial
services. He can be reached at alpesh-patel@msn.com